Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jack's avatar

I'm wondering if there is a longer version of the video with audio or just audio that is used in the second example. It is certainly a beauty opioid for me!

Pjohn's avatar

I have to admit they don't do anything for me personally (sorry!) - but I do admire the novel way your compositions essentially confess to the internet-at-large that you're experienced in taking psychedelics..

Music criticism isn't my forté (er.. nor my piano..) but for what it's worth I think the reason audioreactive visuals haven't really been explored to their fullest extent is that the visuals always seem - to the casual observer - to mostly just track the beat (as yours do; I intend this constructively/exploratively and hope it doesn't come across as too critical) rather than tracking more complex/thematic musical structures:

If the piece starts off with murky, bassy rumblings and then there's an uplifting break-in-the-clouds moment, the visuals could start off murky and cloudy, and then bright clear visuals should pierce through.

If the piece has a simple melody that's later repeated 'in earnest' with a key change, more complex harmonics, more layers of instruments/effects, etc. the visuals could establish a pattern that's simple and maybe even a bit washed-out, then that pattern could be repeated with more richness and complexity and colour.

(Of course, I understand this stuff isn't really possible with a five-second clip!)

Essentially, I suppose I'm suggesting that audioreactive visuals could work the way a film score does, except backwards - rather than starting with the visual ideas you want to convey and then composing a score to suit those visuals, you could start with the musical ideas you want to convey and then compose a visual track that aligns with that intention.

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?